nexmon – Blame information for rev 1
?pathlinks?
Rev | Author | Line No. | Line |
---|---|---|---|
1 | office | 1 | <?xml version="1.0"?> |
2 | <!DOCTYPE refentry PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN" |
||
3 | "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd" [ |
||
4 | ]> |
||
5 | <refentry id="glib-resources" revision="17 Jan 2002"> |
||
6 | <refmeta> |
||
7 | <refentrytitle>Mailing lists and bug reports</refentrytitle> |
||
8 | <manvolnum>3</manvolnum> |
||
9 | <refmiscinfo>Mailing lists and bug reports</refmiscinfo> |
||
10 | </refmeta> |
||
11 | |||
12 | <refnamediv> |
||
13 | <refname>Mailing lists and bug reports</refname> |
||
14 | <refpurpose> |
||
15 | Getting help with GLib |
||
16 | </refpurpose> |
||
17 | </refnamediv> |
||
18 | |||
19 | <refsect1> |
||
20 | <title>Filing a bug report or feature request</title> |
||
21 | |||
22 | <para> |
||
23 | If you encounter a bug, misfeature, or missing feature in GLib, please |
||
24 | file a bug report on |
||
25 | <ulink url="http://bugzilla.gnome.org">http://bugzilla.gnome.org</ulink>. |
||
26 | We'd also appreciate reports of incomplete or misleading information in |
||
27 | the GLib documentation; file those against the "docs" component of the "glib" |
||
28 | product in Bugzilla. |
||
29 | </para> |
||
30 | |||
31 | <para> |
||
32 | Don't hesitate to file a bug report, even if you think we may know |
||
33 | about it already, or aren't sure of the details. Just give us as much |
||
34 | information as you have, and if it's already fixed or has already been |
||
35 | discussed, we'll add a note to that effect in the report. |
||
36 | </para> |
||
37 | |||
38 | <para> |
||
39 | The bug tracker should definitely be used for feature requests, it's |
||
40 | not only for bugs. We track all GLib development in Bugzilla, so it's |
||
41 | the way to be sure the GLib developers won't forget about an issue. |
||
42 | </para> |
||
43 | |||
44 | </refsect1> |
||
45 | |||
46 | <refsect1> |
||
47 | <title>Submitting Patches</title> |
||
48 | |||
49 | <para> |
||
50 | If you develop a bugfix or enhancement for GLib, please file that in |
||
51 | Bugzilla as well. Bugzilla allows you to attach files; please attach a |
||
52 | patch generated by the <command>diff</command> utility, using the |
||
53 | <option>-u</option> option to make the patch more readable. All patches |
||
54 | must be offered under the terms of the GNU LGPL license, so be sure you |
||
55 | are authorized to give us the patch under those terms. |
||
56 | </para> |
||
57 | |||
58 | <para> |
||
59 | If you want to discuss your patch before or after developing it, mail |
||
60 | <ulink url="mailto:gtk-devel-list@gnome.org">gtk-devel-list@gnome.org</ulink>. |
||
61 | But be sure to file the Bugzilla report as well; if the patch is only on the |
||
62 | list and not in Bugzilla, it's likely to slip through the cracks. |
||
63 | </para> |
||
64 | |||
65 | </refsect1> |
||
66 | |||
67 | <refsect1> |
||
68 | <title>Mailing lists</title> |
||
69 | |||
70 | <para> |
||
71 | There are several mailing lists dedicated to GTK+ and related |
||
72 | libraries. Discussion of GLib generally takes place on these lists. |
||
73 | You can subscribe or view the archives of these lists on |
||
74 | <ulink url="http://mail.gnome.org">http://mail.gnome.org</ulink>. |
||
75 | </para> |
||
76 | |||
77 | <para> |
||
78 | <variablelist> |
||
79 | |||
80 | <varlistentry> |
||
81 | <term><ulink url="mailto:gtk-list@gnome.org">gtk-list@gnome.org</ulink></term> |
||
82 | <listitem><para> |
||
83 | gtk-list covers general GTK+ (and GLib) topics; questions about using GLib |
||
84 | in programs, GLib from a user standpoint, announcements of GLib-related projects |
||
85 | would all be on-topic. The bulk of the traffic consists of GTK+ programming |
||
86 | questions. |
||
87 | </para></listitem> |
||
88 | </varlistentry> |
||
89 | |||
90 | <varlistentry> |
||
91 | <term><ulink url="mailto:gtk-devel-list@gnome.org">gtk-devel-list@gnome.org</ulink></term> |
||
92 | <listitem><para> |
||
93 | gtk-devel-list is for discussion of work on GTK+ (and GLib) itself, it is |
||
94 | <emphasis>not</emphasis> for asking questions about how to use GTK+ (or GLib) |
||
95 | in applications. gtk-devel-list is appropriate for discussion of patches, |
||
96 | bugs, proposed features, and so on. |
||
97 | </para></listitem> |
||
98 | </varlistentry> |
||
99 | |||
100 | <varlistentry> |
||
101 | <term><ulink url="mailto:gtk-doc-list@gnome.org">gtk-doc-list@gnome.org</ulink></term> |
||
102 | <listitem><para> |
||
103 | gtk-doc-list is for discussion of the <application>gtk-doc</application> |
||
104 | documentation system (used to document GTK+ and Glib), and for work on the GTK+ |
||
105 | (and GLib) documentation. |
||
106 | </para></listitem> |
||
107 | </varlistentry> |
||
108 | |||
109 | </variablelist> |
||
110 | </para> |
||
111 | |||
112 | </refsect1> |
||
113 | |||
114 | |||
115 | </refentry> |